The Board considered a report of
the Strategic Director – Children and Young People outlining the findings of
the scrutiny topic on oral health of children and young people in Halton, which
had been carried out following a resolution of the Board on 27th
November 2007 that oral health should provide the focus for scrutiny during
2008. This topic was in line with the Council’s Annual Performance Assessment
of Services for Children and Young People in Halton where it was recommended
that the Local Authority should “accelerate plans to improve oral health”.
The Oral Health Scrutiny Group
had been a joint scrutiny topic comprising Members from both the Healthy
Halton, and the Children and Young People, Policy and Performance Boards. The
aim of the group had been to:
- receive
and consider evidence presented on the state of children’s oral health in
the Borough;
- consider
the information in relation to statistical neighbours and national and regional
benchmarks; and
- consider
future strategies for securing improvement.
The Group had met on a number of
occasions and considered evidence presented by Dr. K. Milsom, Consultant in
Dental Public Health, regarding the state of dental health experienced by
children and young people in the Borough. Members interrogated the evidence
presented and a summary of the Group’s findings was outlined within the report
for the Board’s consideration.
It was noted that detailed dental
health data on the adult population was not readily available; however, the
Decennial Adult Dental Health surveys repeatedly confirmed that the North West
had the worst dental health in England, and Halton and St. Helens PCT had
developed its Dental Commissioning Strategy accordingly. This strategy had been
accepted by the PCT Board in March 2008 and funding had been provided to ensure
that key dental health objectives identified within the strategy were
addressed. In 2008-9 the PCT had elected to focus on two priority issues:
- improving
child dental health and reducing dental health inequality; and
- improving
access to primary dental care
and further information was outlined within the report in
relation to this.
Dr Milsom attended the meeting to
respond to Members’ queries and the following points were noted:
- dental
decay was a disease of deprivation;
- the
average child in Halton at age 5 had 2 decayed teeth;
- effective
tooth brushing could reduce gum disease but had very little impact on
tooth decay;
- this
was the first time the PCT was actively addressing this issue;
- fluoride
was a naturally occurring mineral which, providing it was consumed at an
appropriate level, could reduce tooth decay – the PCT was looking at a
number of strategies to use fluoride to reduce children’s tooth decay in
the area;
- there
was evidence that painting the biting surfaces of teeth with fluoride
varnish twice/three times per year could result in a reduction of 30%-40%
in prevalence of tooth decay;
- the
PCT was purchasing the varnish and paying dentists to carry out the work
in their surgeries and the impact of this would be measured over the next
three years;
- there
was a trial currently ongoing in Lancashire where this work was being done
in the school setting. If this was successful, a similar proposal would be
a priority for Halton in order to reach all children as 30% of children in
Halton did not attend a dentist regularly – results were expected early in
the year;
- in
the meantime, fluoride toothpaste was to be issued to all children aged
three and over in the area;
- research
had shown that excessive use of fluoride could cause white spots on teeth,
although this would not happen if used after the age of three as, by this
time, the front teeth had calcified;
- once
a dentist had made a prescription for the varnish, the painting of teeth
could be carried out by a therapist or a dental nurse and so was extremely
cost effective;
- the
Government was looking at amending the Dental Act in order that dentists
could make a class decision in this respect, eg the decision could be made
collectively for the whole of Halton;
- the
World Health Organisation made it clear that any dental professional who
saw neglect had a duty of care to refer the matter to the appropriate services
and so dentists who viewed a child with very bad teeth would draw this to
the attention of the school and subsequently to the parent;
- the
PCT was committed to spending money to increase the number of dentists in
the area;
- all
dentists were to be invited to work hours to suit the needs of patients;
- it
was intended that, by the end of the year, there would be a substantial
increase in the number of dentists in the area reducing any access problem
to zero;
- recommendation
2.4 within the report was intended to assist homeless young people;
- simple
pain relief and care could be obtained from the dental access centre at
Halton Lea;
- the
centre had been the subject of an extensive review and there was work
ongoing looking at its role – developments arising from this work were
expected within the next six months; and
- the
Strategic Health Authority was looking at the fluoridisation of water,
which had been successful elsewhere in the country, although this could
only be implemented following a comprehensive consultation process.
The Chairman thanked Dr Milsom
for attending the meeting.
RESOLVED: That
(1) the draft Topic Report
be endorsed;
(2) the Executive Board
be requested to approve the recommendations contained in 3 to 5 below and
report back to the March meeting of the Policy and Performance Board on its
conclusion;
(3) Halton and St. Helens
PCT should, subject to parental consent and outcomes of the “Lancashire Trial”,
support the administering of fluoride varnish to children, to take place in
school settings;
(4) Halton and St. Helens
PCT should take steps to support the take-up of dental services by vulnerable
young people who may not have regular access to dental services or be
registered with a dentist; and
(5) the Children and Young
People’s Policy and Performance Board should keep under review the
implementation of the Oral Health Strategy.