Venue: The Boardroom, Municipal Building
Contact: Angela Scott on 0151 511 8670 or Email: Angela.scott@halton.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
MINUTES Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 11 February 2016 were taken as read and signed as a correct record. |
|
Leader's Portfolio |
|
Syrian Refugee Crisis PDF 242 KB Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Chief Executive, on the Syrian
Refugee Crisis, the current response from Central Government and at local
level. The Board was advised that Halton was working collaboratively with all the
North West local authorities in respect of this agenda, and was part of the Merseyside
sub regional group. It was reported that the Council had developed measures to
fully engage with communities, statutory and non- statutory agencies including
the faith and voluntary sector, to improve the understanding of the refugee
crisis and the implications this had for Halton and the wider North West. The report set out details of the Asylum
Dispersal Programme (COMPASS), which the Home Office had contracted out to
Serco to provide asylum accommodation, transport and support. It was noted that
the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPR), would expand to admit
20,000 Syrian refugees to be admitted to the UK by 2020. It was further reported that each
local authority in the North West would take the lead role to work with local
partners to ensure that arrivals were provided with suitable accommodation and the
specific needs of this vulnerable group were met. Central Government would meet
the cost of the arrivals in terms of orientation, support, health and education
costs for the first year, with reducing support in years 2-5. RESOLVED: That Council 1) support
the COMPASS and VPR Programme; 2) work
with all the North West Local Authorities to establish a robust operational
mechanism to oversee and deliver the programme; and 3) learn
from the examples of best practice nationally, to ensure that Halton provides
effective humanitarian support, which is measured and proportionate, and takes
into account the needs of those relocated under the programme and Halton’s existing communities. |
|
Health and Wellbeing Portfolio |
|
The National Living Wage – Care Provider Contracts PDF 265 KB Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Strategic Director, People and
Economy, on the planned introduction of the National Living Wage, and the
impact for the pooled budget for Health and Care Services in Halton. The Board was advised that a compulsory
National Living Wage (NLW) for workers aged 25 and above would be introduced
from 1 April 2016. It was noted that the National Minimum Wage (NMW) would
remain in place, and the distinction between the two was clarified in the
report. It was reported that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had commented that
to help businesses to afford the increase in wages, he was cutting Corporation
Tax by 2% by 2020 and that employers could reduce the amount of National
Insurance Contributions that were paid for employees by 50%. In Halton, there were currently 12 domiciliary care providers working
across the Borough in 29 care homes. The majority of the contracted
organisations had stated that the impact of the NLW would place economic
challenges on their organisations and impact on their ability to remain viable
in future. A finance model to establish the potential impact of the cost of the NLW
had been designed and adopted by local authorities across the North West
region. This initial analysis, set out in the report, provided Members with an
indication of the costs involved for Halton. RESOLVED: That approval be given to
actively enter into discussions with Care Providers, to agree how additional
costs will be met, as set out in paragraphs 5.4.3 and 5.4.4 of the report. |
|
(N.B. The following Councillors made a Disclosable
Other Interest in the following item of business for the reasons stated.
Councillor Polhill as Chair of the Mersey Gateway Crossings Board Limited and
Councillor Wharton as Vice-Chair of the Mersey Gateway Crossings Board Limited) |
|
Transportation Portfolio |
|
Mersey Gateway Bridge Project - Progress Update PDF 435 KB Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Strategic Director, Community and
Resources, which provided a progress update on the Mersey Gateway Bridge
Project (the Project) and on the Mersey Gateway Crossings Board Limited (MGCB),
for June to December 2015. The Board was advised that the MGCB was a special purpose vehicle,
established by Halton Borough Council, with delegated authority to deliver the
Mersey Gateway Bridge project, and to administer and oversee the construction,
maintenance and tolling of the new tolled crossings, which included the tolling
of the Silver Jubilee Bridge. The MGCB were commissioned to deliver the Project on behalf of the
Council and operate as a commercial, not for profit organisation, on an arm’s
length basis. The report provided an update on progress of the Project and the
performance of the MGCB in monitoring the Project, as required under the
Governance Agreement. It covered:- · Key
Construction Events; · Construction
of the Main Crossing, Landside and Highways; · Most
recent activities on site; · Programmed
activities for January 2016; · Health
and Safety; · Key
Performance Indicators; · Current
Progress on the actions/risks at Financial Close; and · Production
of an Annual Business Plan. RESOLVED: That 1) progress with
the Mersey Gateway Bridge Project, as
set out in the report, be noted; and 2) the performance
of the Mersey Gateway Crossings Board Limited in monitoring the Project
Company’s performance, as set out in the report, be noted. |
|
Resources Portfolio |
|
The Establishment, Victoria Square, Widnes PDF 218 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Strategic Director, People and
Economy, on the proposed sale of the Council’s reversionary freehold interest
in The Establishment (Former Halton Business Forum). The Board was advised that the former Halton Business Forum was
currently leased to SJL Leisure Ltd for a term of 150 years from November 2008.
The original proposal was for the leaseholder to develop the site for a hotel
and a substantial two storey extension was built at the rear of the original
listed building to facilitate this. It was reported that, due to the downturn in the economy, the only area
of the building in use was the ground floor bar, the remainder of the property
was unoccupied. As the leaseholder would now like to develop the vacant area to
provide office space close to the town centre, it was reported he had made an
offer of £20,000 (plus professional costs) to the Council for the disposal of
the Freehold Interest. This amount would be paid in instalments, as set out in
the report. RESOLVED: That 1) disposal
of the Freehold interest on the basis set out in the report, be approved; and 2) the Operational
Director, Economy, Enterprise and Property, be authorised to arrange for all
required documentation to be completed to the satisfaction of the Operational
Director, Legal and Democratic Services. |
|
2016/17 Quarter 3 Spending PDF 757 KB Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Operational Director, Finance, which summarised the overall revenue and capital spending position as at 31 December 2015. In overall terms, revenue expenditure was £39,000 below the budget profile, however, this was only a guide to eventual spending. It was noted that spend to date showed a very marginal position and careful monitoring through to year-end was required to ensure spend was within overall budget. Saving proposals of £11.5m had already been approved by Council, and early implementation of these proposals had helped to manage the overall spend for the last three months of the financial year. It was noted that spending on
employees was £0.930m below the budget profile at the end of the quarter, with
vacant posts in a number of Departments helping to generate the favourable
variance to date. Members were advised that there continued to be budget pressures within the Children and Families Department which was significantly over the profiled budget to date. With regard to capital spending, it was reported that spending to the 31 December 2015 totalled £19.896m, which was slightly ahead of the planned spending of £19.431m at this stage. However, this represented 65% of the total capital programme of £30.478m (which assumed a 20% slippage between years). The Council’s Balance Sheet was monitored regularly in accordance with the Reserves and Balances Strategy which formed part of the Medium Term Financial Strategy. The key reserves and balances had been reviewed and were considered prudent and appropriate at this stage in the financial year and within the current financial climate. RESOLVED: That 1) all spending continued to be limited only to the absolutely essential; 2) Strategic Directors ensure that overall spending at year-end was within their total operational budget; and 3) Council be recommended to approve the revised Capital Programme as set out in Appendix 3, attached to the report. |
|
Treasury Management Quarter 3 2015/16 PDF 260 KB Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Operational Director, Finance,
which updated them on activities undertaken on the money market as required by
the Treasury Management Statement. The report provided supporting
information on the economic outlook, interest rate forecast, short term
borrowing rates, longer term borrowing rates, borrowing and investments, new
long term borrowing and policy guidelines. It was noted that no debt
rescheduling had been undertaken during the quarter. RESOLVED: That the report be noted. |
|
SCHEDULE 12A OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ACCESS TO INFORMATION) ACT 1985 PART II In
this case the Board has a discretion to exclude the press and public and, in
view of the nature of the business to be transacted, it is RECOMMENDED
that under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, having been
satisfied that in all the circumstances of the case the public interest in
maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the
information, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the
following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely
disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of Part 1 of
Schedule 12A to the Act. Minutes: (1) whether
Members of the press and public should be excluded from the meeting of the
Board during consideration of the following item of business in accordance with
Sub-Section 4 of Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 because it was
likely that, in view of the nature of the business to be considered, exempt
information would be disclosed, being information defined in Section 100 (1)
and paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972; and (2) whether the disclosure of information was in the public
interest, whether any relevant exemptions were applicable and whether, when
applying the public interest test and exemptions, the public interest in
maintaining the exemption outweighed that in disclosing the information. RESOLVED: That as, in
all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the
exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information, members
of the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of
the following item of business in accordance with Sub-Section 4 of Section 100A
of the Local Government Act 1972 because it was likely that, in view of the
nature of the business, exempt information would be disclosed, being
information defined in Section 100 (1) and paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the
Local Government Act 1972. |
|
Resources Portfolio |
|
Discretionary Business Rates Relief Request Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Strategic Director, People and
Economy, and the Strategic Director, Community and Resources, on a request for
discretionary business rates relief. The Board was advised that under the Business Rates Retention Scheme,
introduced in April 2013, the Council retained 49% of the business rates income
that it collected, and offered a financial incentive to promote economic
growth. Halton had historically considered applications for discretionary
business rates relief on a case by case basis and where there were exceptional
reasons for doing so. The report set out details of the current request for Members’
consideration. RESOLVED: That discretionary business rates relief of up to 100% in respect of the company referred to in the report, be approved for 2016/17 only, on the basis set out in paragraph 3.9 of the report. |
|
MINUTES ISSUED: 1
March 2016 CALL-IN: 8 March 2016 Any matter decided by
the Executive Board may be called in no later than 5.00pm on 8 March 2016 |