Venue: The Board Room - Municipal Building, Widnes. View directions
Contact: Lynn Derbyshire on 0151 471 7389 or e-mail lynn.derbyshire@halton.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
COUNCILLORS DAVE LEADBETTER AND JOHN SWAIN Minutes: The Board stood in silence as a mark of respect for the sad passing of
Councillors Dave Leadbetter and John Swain. |
|
MINUTES Minutes: The Minutes of the meetings held on 26 January 2012 and 15 February 2012 were taken as read and signed as a correct record. |
|
Procurement Progress Report PDF 23 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Chief Executive which advised Members of the progress made in implementing the agreed procurement process. The Board was advised that at the special meeting of the Mersey Gateway
Executive Board on 15 February 2012 Members had agreed the prequalification
result and authorised the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader, to
move to commence the tendering process by issuing the ITPD document to
Bidders. On 16 February the six Bidders had been informed of the
prequalification result by letter from the Project Director. The letter offered
the unsuccessful candidates a debriefing opportunity, which they all accepted.
The debriefing meetings had taken on 29 February 2012. Letters to the three
successful candidates had also offered to provide feedback on performance and
these debriefing meetings had taken place on 1 March 2012. The Board was further advised that a press release announcing the
results of prequalification had been released on 17 February 2012. The
Department for Transport press office had been consulted on the draft release.
The selected Bidders were reported in local news and appeared across the
national technical journals and the media. A copy of the press release was
attached as Appendix 1 to the report. It was reported that the letter to the three Bidders had set out the expected
timetable for commencing the tendering process.
The ITPD was planned to be issued to Bidders during the week of 12 March
2012, to be discussed at a Dialogue Commencement meeting with each Bidder
during the following week. Over the coming year, Dialogue meetings were
envisaged to be held at the Stadium with the occasional meeting held in the
offices of DLAP in Manchester or London. On average it was expected that we
would meet with each Bidder once every three weeks. The ITPD set out the Council’s agenda
covering a schedule of meetings up to November 2012. The Project organisation
to progress the Dialogue process was attached at Appendix 2 to the report. Furthermore, instructions to Bidders, as part of the ITPD, included measures to ensure that communication between the Council and Bidders were classified as commercial in confidence, to ensure competition was protected so that the Council received bids that maximised the potential to secure value for money. The integrity of the competition relies on the security of information and discussions during an extended procurement process. The governance arrangements agreed with the Board envisaged the confidential nature of issues arising during Dialogue and were reflected in the Chief Executive being given delegated authority to deliver procurement in consultation with the Leader. This delegation provided the project team with access to a streamlined chain of authority where decisions could be taken expeditiously in circumstances that maintained confidentiality. The regular meetings of the MGEB, at every two months would enable reports on progress to be made to keep the Board up to date with key issues arising in the Dialogue process. Alongside these arrangements, the portfolio holder Cllr Stockton also held regular ... view the full minutes text for item 20. |
|
SCHEDULE 12A OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ACCESS TO INFORMATION) ACT 1985 Minutes: The Board considered: 1)
Whether
Members of the press and public should be excluded from the meeting of the
Board during consideration of the following item of business in accordance with
Sub-Section 4 of Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 because it was
likely that, in view of the nature of the business to be considered, exempt
information would be disclosed, being information defined in Section 100 (1)
and paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972; and 2)
Whether
the disclosure of information was in the pubic
interest, whether any relevant exemptions were applicable and whether, when
applying the public interest test and exemptions, the public interest in maintaining
the exemption outweighed that in disclosing the information. RESOLVED: That as, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in disclosing the information, members of the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following item of business in accordance with Sub-Section 4 of Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 because it was likely that, in view of the nature of the business, exempt information would be disclosed, being information defined in Section 100 (1) and paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. |
|
Mersey Gateway Bridge - ITPD Executive Summary Minutes: The Board considered a report of
the Chief Executive which informed Members that the Invitation To Participate in Dialogue (ITPD)
required a document to be issued to Bidders providing instructions, information
and guidance to support the competitive dialogue process The report provided an executive summary of
the ITPD document and highlighted the key issues covered. The Board stressed the importance of securing an acceptable toll
discount scheme. Officers advised that the arrangements being taken forward
require Bidders to submit their Revenue Collection Business Plans which will
include proposals for toll discount schemes. Details of the tolling schemes
proposed by Bidders will be reported to the Board later in the year. Bidders
tolling proposals would be compatible with the funding agreement between the
Council and Government which in the base case limits the cost of a discount
scheme to 10 percent of expected toll revenue. The
Board will be able to take into account the proposals emerging from Bidders
submissions when considering its priorities for toll discounts within the
funding constrains in place. RESOLVED: That the summary of the
ITPD document and that the substantive proposals have
been agreed with the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader be noted. |
|
MINUTES ISSUED: CALL-IN: Any matter decided
by the Mersey Gateway Executive Board may be called in no later than 5.00pm on xxxx |