Minutes:
The Board
considered a report on the Council’s overall revenue net spend position as of
31 May 2025 together with a 2025/26 forecast outturn position. The report was
presented by the Director of Finance and it did not focus on capital spending.
The Executive Board had requested that a copy of the report be shared with each
Policy and Performance Board for information, to ensure that all Members had a
full appreciation of the Councilwide financial position, in addition to their
specific areas of responsibility. In presenting the report, it was noted that
the Council had to spend in budget by the end of 2025.
It was shared
with the Board that the Council overspent by £16 million over its budget but
they only had £6 million in reserves. Therefore, the Council asked Central
Government for £10 million to cover the rest which they agreed to do. As a
result, the Council has not needed to ask for more money yet, but this will
depend on the Council’s cashflow. Interest to borrow from Central Government
was high at present at 6.2% over 20 years. The Council will ask to borrow more
money if it will run out of money at the end of the year which is likely as it
was set to overspend by £29 million.
It was
clarified that the Chief Executive Delivery Unit was the Transformation
Delivery Team, Risk Management Team and some policy staff.
The Board
noted that the school saving costs should have been brought in before the
schools started the new term as they would start the year by overspending.
In response,
officers stated that due to the time taken to organise the savings, they would
not be implemented until September 2026. This should prevent disruption for
school placements too.
Regarding
home to school transport, officers agreed to see how many of these pupils had
EHCPs.
The Board
noted that more money was spent on agency staff for adult care homes, who had
relationships with the residents, than the permanent staff and they received
higher wages. There were also delays with residents getting their relatives
into care homes.
Officers
noted that agency costs were costing the Council £600,000 monthly.
Inspectors
from the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government will check the
methodology for spending at the Council, but they had a backlog as 40 other
authorities were overspending, and they had to visit all of them. The visit
will likely happen in October or November 2025, and they will report their
finding to Ministers. The Ministers will then give the final approval for the
Council’s budget before it is set in February 2026.
A Board
Member noted that the Children, Young People & Families PPB wanted to look
at the results of the consultation on school transport and make recommendations
back to the Executive Board. After holding an extraordinary meeting, they made
some recommendations back to the Executive Board with some rationalisation for
their recommendations for savings. For example, whether taxis could be shared
amongst some students with EHCPs and independence training so they would be
able to make their own way to school. This would help manage demand without
increasing costs.
It was
confirmed that the Transformation Board were going to determine whether
Telecare should continue.
RESOLVED:
That Executive Directors continue to implement to proposed saving measures as set out in Appendix 3.
Supporting documents: