Minutes:
The Board considered the results
of the 2025 Staff Survey as stated in the report. It was the first staff survey
since 2019, and this was undertaken to see how the culture had changed and to
try and address any staff issues that arose. Work was done to initiate
responses through non-laptop using members of staff with ballot boxes. Going
forward, the initial responses will be analysed along with the text box
answers. The Corporate Workforce Board will address the concerns raised by
officers with these answers and with directorate surveys going forward and
create an action plan to be rolled out to the whole Council.
In response to a suggestion from
the Chair regarding a competition the increase engagement, officers stated this
may influence responses and they would rather have less but honest responses.
In his line of work, a Board
Member noted that his job had staff surveys, but their response rate was 60-70%
as they did have incentives to respond to the survey. He queried if another
survey platform would get more engagement. He also would have liked to have
seen the methodology in how the results were gathered.
With responding to a request for
clarification regarding the behaviours that needed improving in the Council,
officers clarified that respondents determined which behaviours they felt
needing improving most so they put the listed behaviours in a priority order
for them.
It was confirmed that the
responses to the survey came from all directorates with no big majority from
one directorate. They did not ask about pay grades in the survey.
The Board noted that the survey
results implied that 1/3 of staff felt officers did not work well with
councillors and 80% felt that Councillors did not know what officers did. They
felt that Councillors needed to do ‘PR’ work with officers and increase engagement
with them.
In the next survey, the Board
suggested that they ask whether each department had a leadership culture and
whether they were happy with it and ask how long the staff member had worked
for the Council. They were keen to see how different departments understood
work culture in their areas.
In response, officers said that
questions alluding to this will be included in other corporate and departmental
staff surveys planed with adults and children’s social care. All these surveys
will be looked at by the Corporate Workforce Board. The Workforce Board may
look at reoccurring issues raised and create a focus group to try to resolve
the issue.
Officers clarified that there had
not been a staff survey for six years because it felt inappropriate to ask for
responses to their survey during a pandemic and their priorities would have
been elsewhere.
The Board noted that it was
important to show members of staff that their comments made a difference,
otherwise they would not respond to the survey again.
In response to a point from a
Board Member, officers noted that staff sickness had increased from 2024
because the Council had an aging workforce who would have some illnesses that
younger officers do not. Stress was the main reason for absence in the workforce.
The Board reiterated that
officers should try to get more than 25% of the Council’s workforce to respond
to the next survey. They suggested a ‘pulse’ survey every 6 months and doing a
‘you say we did’ with the Working Board.
Regarding a question on whether
home working impacted the results, officers noted that there was only a 19%
response rate in 2005 but in 2019 there was a 46% response rate which was the
highest amount received. Officers reiterated that they were keen to show staff
members that they were actioning their comments.
RESOLVED:
That the report be noted.
Supporting documents: